Bands Tumblr Themes
awwww-cute:

My stepdad was disappointed when he came down to cuddle some puppies and they were already occupied in my lap. When he fell asleep, they decided I was not the Chosen One and he never even knew

awwww-cute:

My stepdad was disappointed when he came down to cuddle some puppies and they were already occupied in my lap. When he fell asleep, they decided I was not the Chosen One and he never even knew

bowtied:

evil-sherlock-holmes:

textsfromxavieracademy:

girlwithgoldeyes:

GUYS AT WORK WE WERE DOING A GLASS PAINTING PROJECT AND MY DESIGN WAS THIS

image

PLOT TWIST:

THATS GALLIFREYAN FOR “FUCK BITCHES, GET MONEY.”


PLOT TWIST 2: IT’S GONNA BE ON DISPLAY IN MY CITY’S ART GALLERY

HALP

this is my most reblogged text post

why

hahaha can you imagine the doctor strolling into that city art gallery and doing a double take at that

image

bloodstainedvibrator:

selections from the watercolor series I don’t want your love unless you know I am repulsive, and love me even as you know it. 

Emily Kaelin

http://society6.com/emilykaelin

beesmygod:

pepperonideluxe:

I’m on a quest to write the worst video game joke. Care to join me?

oh my GOD

beesmygod:

pepperonideluxe:

I’m on a quest to write the worst video game joke. Care to join me?

oh my GOD

c0ssette:

Details of Michelangelo’s masterpiece “David” 1501–1504

I deduce, Watson, you hate being an everyman | The Sunday Times

mid0nz:

violethuntress:

incurablylazydevil:

Martin Freeman won an Emmy last week for his role in Sherlock but summons up the fire of his new stage role as Richard III to warn against seeing him solely as a sardonic Englishman

by Josh Glancy 

Freeman as Watson with Benedict Cumberbatch’s SherlockFreeman as Watson with Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock (BBC)

If they were having a race to the top, Martin Freeman would be the tortoise and Benedict Cumberbatch would be the hare. Cumberbatch, tall and unconventionally handsome, brimming with public school charm and swagger. Freeman looking like a bloke you’d meet down the pub. Cumberbatch hared to global stardom, but Freeman is running his own race; slower, less ostentatious but ever so successful.

Since their Sherlock bromance first captivated the nation in 2010, this unlikely duo have conquered Hollywood and the world. Their careers have become strangely symbiotic: Sherlock Holmes and Dr John Watson, Bilbo Baggins and Smaug the dragon, little and large. So it was no surprise when the pair won awards at last week’s Emmys. Cumberbatch as Sherlock pipped Freeman in Fargo for outstanding lead actor in a mini-series or a movie, but Freeman picked up outstanding supporting actor in a mini-series or a movie for his role as Watson.

Freeman was reading in bed when he received the news in a text from his agent. Did it feel like a bit of a consolation prize? “Yeah, I really hated it,” he says. “No, really, we’re all very pleased for each other. We all win because it’s all good for Sherlock. For a British show to be doing that well is a thrill. I emailed Ben in the morning to congratulate him and he rang me later on.”

Such is the on-screen chemistry between Cumberbatch and Freeman, there has been widespread suggestion that the Sherlock-Watson relationship is about more than just solving crimes and banter in Baker Street. Much of China is convinced the pair are lovers.

“It’s not just in China — plenty of places, plenty of households,” he says. “I don’t really quite know why that has caught on. It’s now taken on a political dimension to it. What started as a bit of fun — a slightly irreverent, sly, mocking thing — has now turned into, for some people, if you don’t think they’re gay, then you’re denying they’re gay and you are somehow homophobic. I mean genuinely — it’s that strong. It’s very odd, the fact that it has become a po-faced, political thing.”

Where does this relationship, at once fractious and deeply affectionate, come from? “Chemistry just happens or it doesn’t; you can’t work at it, you can’t manufacture it. Obviously it helps if people have got their chops about them and can actually do the work. But there are plenty of good actors who you could put together who don’t have that chemistry. We were lucky. It just worked.”

Freeman wasn’t in Los Angeles to collect his award because he is playing Richard III at the Trafalgar Studios in London’s West End. Cumberbatch wasn’t there either, leading Sherlock’s co-creator, Steven Moffat, to joke that he was “too big to come the Emmys”.

The suspicion with Freeman was that he doesn’t much fancy the gilded backslappery of Hollywood. “Look, if I wasn’t doing a play, I would definitely have been at the Emmys — I don’t mind all that. It’s nice for a little holiday, but it’s not my life. I think most of the people who were there, it’s not their life either. Everyone basically goes home to their family and puts the kettle on.”

Freeman has come a long way from playing the sales representative Tim Canterbury in The Office, but the critics have been quick to draw a thread through his work. Tim, John Watson, Bilbo Baggins, and Lester Nygaard in Fargo. The everyman, the ordinary guy everyone can identify with, the middle-of-the-road Englishman; sardonic, wry and slightly low on self-confidence.

Freeman isn’t convinced. In fact, he’s a bit fed up with it. He is generally polite and good-natured, but the merest mention of the word everyman rouses his ire. “People ask, ‘Is there any difference between Tim and John Watson?’ Well, I’m afraid if you can’t see that, you’re a f****** moron. People have no business writing about the art of television if they can’t see it.

“I’m not denying you can’t find a thread between the parts I’ve played, which you could probably do with every single other actor working. Whether it’s me or Daniel Day-Lewis — he’s not often going to play a bit-part waiter. I think a lot of it is Pavlovian; people see what they want to see.

“I have played some things that have a thread in them but that’s never been my plan. To be honest, I’ve played lots of other things, and they’ve not been that famous, they’ve not been huge hits.”

Freeman, here playing Bilbo Baggins, says it is wrong to suggest he plays only one kind of characterFreeman, here playing Bilbo Baggins, says it is wrong to suggest he plays only one kind of character (Warner Bros)

Freeman’s gig as Richard III is one of these less-famous roles. He’s garnered mixed reviews, with some critics suggesting his performance is “underpowered” and “lacks all spark and charisma”.

Is he less well suited to playing a king? “What I’m able to play in Richard III is something that I’ve had about me for as long as I’ve been acting. It’s a surprise to other people but that’s always been in there. It was all that stuff that made me want to act, it wasn’t thinking, ‘Oh, I want to be a lovelorn everyman.’”

He doesn’t have Cumberbatch’s swagger, but Freeman has plenty of confidence in himself and his acting ability. The remarkable journey of the tortoise and the hare will continue next year, when the pair are reunited for series four of Sherlock. The character of Watson has married Mary Morstan, who turned out to be a gun-toting secret agent with a murky past.

Will Sherlock leave them alone to be happily married? “Presumably not. It’s the tensions within those characters that make the show. Now that Mary is very much part of the setup, that can’t be a happy, or rather a straightforward, thing. Without the tension between John and Sherlock there is no show. So no, it won’t be un-rocky.”

So, um, like, how does he know that? Have people tweeted things at Amanda? Speechified about queer representation at events? Has he been reading Tumblr?? 

I am frightened. 

This is for everyone who’s asking about my comments about Martin and the “po faced” Social Justice Warriors (SJWs). Fans are concerned that Martin seems to know the details about a seemingly fairly obscure fandom conversation thread about Sherlock and queer representation. I’m saying that it shouldn’t be a surprise at all that he is aware of it. Fandom (especially on tumblr) is not a private space. For better or for worse there is no “fourth wall” between the makers and the audience. It’s more like a membrane. 

fahrlight:

rosalarian:

greenonthursdays:

huffingtonpost:

WHY THIS WOMAN WOULD RATHER READ HARRY POTTER EROTICA THAN WATCH PORN

When spoken word artist Brenna Twohy tells you that she is an unabashed devotee of all things “Potterotica” — erotic fiction based in the magical universe of Harry Potter — your response probably shouldn’t be that her taste is “unrealistic.” 

Watch her full monologue here. 

(Source: National Poetry Slam uploaded by Button Poetry)

I’m happy to be getting to the point where I don’t have to feel weird about enjoying fanfiction, or having written a bunch of it. Partly it’s that the fandom experience has become more broadly shared. Partly it’s that I stopped giving a shit.

And as for why I like the porny sort of fanfiction, see above. She says it better.

I like sex with context. I like sex when it involves fully fleshed out characters. I like the backstories. I like feeling like these people do other things when they aren’t having sex.

YES FANFIC EROTICA IS ACE!…BUT

they are all teens around 15-18, even if she only imagines them as 18 years old kids, it’s still bloody young adults/teens. and some fics are about Snape and Harry/teacher/Student and all that does not sit well with me. I DO KNOW what she means, that erotic fanfic is awesome, but I think Harry Potter is BAD example for it. Because many characters are just kids and teens.

I would not want to read that. I want grown ups XD. Nobody should get off reading about young teens having dirty sex, even worse when you are over 25/30 or something…

not judging, but judging…my2cents.

exit-ghost:

Sherlock: “I know that silence. What?”Mycroft: “I warned you: Don’t get involved.”Sherlock: “Involved? I’m not involved.”

exit-ghost:

Sherlock: “I know that silence. What?”
Mycroft: “I warned you: Don’t get involved.”
Sherlock: “Involved? I’m not involved.”

thisurltotallysucks:

dion-thesocialist:

It’s hilarious that we live in a society that will shame you for how much sex you have and for the junk food you eat. Like, wow, how dare you eat delicious foods and have orgasms, you’re a monster. Enjoy your miserable life filled with pleasures.

image

dutchster:

how to get laid
1. find a couch
2. lay on it
3. i’m so lonely

dallonsmiles:

Dallon Weekes, everybody.

[ ! ]

championcoolbreeze:

obfuscatingdeity:

the thing to realize here is that conservatives find the idea of paying workers a livable wage so absurd that they make hyperbolic comparisons like this

because fifteen dollars an hour and a hundred thousand dollars an hour both mean the same thing to them; more than you deserve

^That commentary is very important.

I need feminism because

mybobafetish:

Donald Sterling “had his privacy violated in his own home,” but Jennifer Lawrence “should have known better than to take those photos.”

Sexism is alive and well, folks.